🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive move to ban social media access for those under 16 is sending ripples internationally. Officials, safety advocates, and families are observing intently to see if this approach will become a template for countries abroad.

Across Europe Trend

Across Europe, a increasing group of states are moving toward similar bans.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for children under fifteen, with the PM stating that phones and apps are "taking away our children's innocence". Legislation could be passed next year.
• The Norwegian government is planning to enforce a access barrier of 15, citing the need to safeguard young people from the "power of the algorithms".
• Ireland is introducing a digital ID system to authenticate the age and identity of social media account holders. Authorities have stated that an similar ban is "a potential tools under consideration".
• In The Spanish government, the president has urged parliament to enact a bill increasing the access age for accessing social media to 16.
• In France, the leader has proposed a ban for children below 15, and a legislative committee has endorsed a related move, alongside an overnight "screen time restriction" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Netherlands has urged families to restrict their children from social media before 15.

For the broader EU, the EU parliament has passed a advisory statement calling for a ban for under-16s unless a parent decides otherwise is provided. While it cautions of the "compulsive" quality of these services, the step does not create mandatory rules.

"An effective age barrier is a solid foundation," stated the parliamentarian driving the initiative.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Stance

Across Britain, the administration has remained open to a potential ban, arguing that "nothing is discarded" but insisting any policy must be "based on strong research".

Earlier, interest built behind a legislative effort to enact restrictions on social media use by under-16s, but it was ultimately modified. However, the administration committed to conduct more studies the matter.

Campaign organizations have voiced concerns. A prominent charity founded by the loved ones of a girl who was lost after encountering disturbing online content contends that a blanket age ban could fail to protect children and could create a "sudden drop-off" of harm when teens turn 16.

"Australia's ban is a reaction to the refusal of the Silicon Valley to create platforms and apps that are safe and suitable for minors," said a prominent child protection advocate.

The US: A Decentralized Picture

Across America, action is primarily occurring at the state government level due to country-wide inaction.

• The state of Utah mandates guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and controls nighttime use.
• Florida has enacted a law prohibiting children under fourteen from joining social media, though it is subject to court battles.
• The state of Virginia has approved a rule limiting under-16s to a single hour of social media use per day, with extra time needing parental permission.
• Georgia, The state of Tennessee, and Louisiana have also enacted laws mandating parental consent for minors to create social media presences.

Despite widespread concern and proposals from various politicians to mimic this lead, a federal ban is right now seen as unlikely.

Global Views

Apart from these regions, additional nations are also taking action.

• Malaysia plans to ban social media for those under sixteen beginning next year.
• The Brazilian authorities has increased the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

But, international organizations take a more measured tone. The UN children's agency has warned that age-based restrictions have downsides and "might prove counterproductive". The body notes that social networks can be a "critical link" for isolated young people and that bans should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to invest in child safeguards.

Even as this global conversation unfolds, the actions of this nation and its followers indicate that governments internationally are no longer content to delay for platforms to make changes on their own.